Skip to content

Which OpenAPI Codegen Should You Choose? openapi-typescript vs hey-api vs Orval vs Kubb

8.1 relevance
Score Breakdown
technical depth
8
novelty
6
actionability
9
community
5
strategic
3
personal
9

Scored daily by a customisable AI persona to surface the most relevant engineering leadership news.

Comprehensive comparison of OpenAPI codegen tools, very actionable

2026-05-21 DevTools dev.to
Which OpenAPI Codegen Should You Choose? openapi-typescript vs hey-api vs Orval vs Kubb
Summary

For large OpenAPI schemas (75k lines, 1200 operations), codegen tool choice impacts generation speed, file count, and maintainability. openapi-typescript excels for types-only, while @hey-api/openapi-ts offers operationId-based SDK with result-style errors and interceptors. Orval generates ecosystem artifacts (TanStack Query, Zod, MSW), and Kubb produces one file per operation via plugin architecture—with hey-api being the most practical for real-world scale.

Key Takeaways
  • Evaluate codegen tools with a representative large schema: measure generation speed, output file count, and error handling pattern before committing to one.
Why it matters

As a platform engineer optimizing developer experience, selecting the right OpenAPI codegen affects linting, IDE indexing, and team maintenance overhead—especially at enterprise-scale schemas.

Author

nyaomaru

More from nyaomaru →