The gap between open weights LLMs and closed source LLMs
7.3 relevance
Score Breakdown
technical depth 8
novelty 5
actionability 7
community 7
strategic 8
personal 10
Scored daily by a customisable AI persona to surface the most relevant engineering leadership news.
Analysis of open vs closed LLMs is highly relevant and actionable for model selection decisions.
Summary
A single benchmark (Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index) suggests open weights LLMs will close the gap with closed source by December 2026, but analysis across 18 separate benchmarks shows the average lag has remained flat at roughly 5 months. Coding benchmarks improved from 15 months behind to only 1–2 months, while other metrics exhibit moderate widening. This underscores the difficulty of measuring LLM quality and warns against drawing conclusions from a single metric.